|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court of Appeal: Peram Ranum Berhad v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri |
|
|
|
|
Issue: Whether the uplifting of fixed deposits upon maturity can be considered as a realization of investment for the purposes of subparagraph 60(3)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act 1967.
Decision: The Court of Appeal dismissed the tax payer’s appeal. The uplifting of fixed deposits cannot be regarded as a realization of investment. The fixed deposit itself is not an investment.
Status: No grounds of judgment are provided by the Court of Appeal. No right of further appeal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above/attached materials are sourced from the website of the official/original source by the Publishers of the CTIM Malaysian Tax portal. You shall not reproduce the above/attached materials in whole or in part without the prior written consent of the original/official source. Neither the Publishers nor the official/original source will be liable for any loss, injury, claim, liability, or damage caused directly, indirectly or incidentally to errors in or omissions from the above/attached materials. The Publishers also disclaim and exclude all liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of the above/attached materials.
The access to, and the use of, the CTIM Malaysian Tax portal and contents therein are subject to the Terms of Use. |
| |
